Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 14:34

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What is your language's pangram?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Amid tariff drama, good economic news can't catch a break - Axios
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What's the most surprising connection you've discovered with someone you just met?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
A high-resolution spectrometer that fits into smartphones - Phys.org
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Tigers Defeat West Virginia, 12-5, to Earn 2025 College World Series Berth - lsusports.net
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
At what stage in your life did you realize, "No, I can't do this any more" and walk out? Why?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
20M Eggs Recalled Amid Salmonella Outbreak - Newser
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.